SAP AGENTIC AI SOLUTIONS

Five workflows. One engineering discipline.

Practical AI assistance for complex SAP work. Explore the problem, the proposed workflow and the evidence a POC should produce.

01
Understand your landscape

SAP Agentic AI Landscape Assessment

In development

The business problem

System inventories, custom code and integration knowledge often sit across disconnected sources. That makes it difficult to decide where automation will help.

Our engineering approach

Assessment agents are designed to structure authorized system inventories, examine custom code and integration metadata, and assemble a traceable view of dependencies and opportunities.

  • Landscape discovery and technical inventories
  • Custom code and integration dependency analysis
  • Automation opportunities and assessment reporting
Landscape / dependency analysis
SAP landscapeAuthorized technical inventory
ApplicationsCustom ABAP
IntegrationInterfaces & APIs
Data layerHANA objects
Analysis agentsMap dependencies · identify candidates · collect evidence
Dependency mapOpportunity shortlistSpecialist review
ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOWHuman oversight by design
  1. 01Authorize scope
  2. 02Discover inventory
  3. 03Map dependencies
  4. 04Assess opportunities
  5. 05Review findings
EXPECTED VALUE

A more structured assessment and an evidence-led shortlist of modernization opportunities for your technical team to evaluate.

BOUNDARIES & VALIDATION

Coverage depends on source quality, access and supported SAP interfaces. Findings need validation by SAP specialists; this is not a replacement for a full architecture or security assessment.

Discuss a scoped feasibility assessment. Availability and supported systems are confirmed during discovery.

Discuss a POC
02
Modernize with control

Automated AI Agentic ABAP Code Remediation

In development

The business problem

Remediating custom ABAP requires understanding both technical findings and business behavior. Repetitive corrections can consume the time needed for complex issues.

Our engineering approach

Specialized agents are designed to interpret findings, propose targeted ABAP changes and coordinate validation. Developers retain ownership of code review, testing and transport decisions.

  • Static-analysis finding interpretation
  • Context-aware remediation proposals
  • Syntax, activation and regression validation workflows
ABAP / proposed remediation
z_demo_materials.abap Illustrative snippet
DATA: lt_mara TYPE TABLE OF mara.

SELECT *
  FROM mara
  INTO TABLE lt_mara
  UP TO 100 ROWS.

" Review scope and selected fields
01Analyze context
02Propose remediation
03Validate in SAP
04Developer review

Example only: narrower selection changes the result structure. Downstream consumers and release compatibility require review.

ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOWHuman oversight by design
  1. 01Read findings
  2. 02Analyze context
  3. 03Propose changes
  4. 04Check syntax
  5. 05Review and test
EXPECTED VALUE

A consistent starting point for remediation, with proposed changes and supporting evidence collected for developer review.

BOUNDARIES & VALIDATION

Generated code can be incorrect. Syntax checks alone do not establish functional equivalence. Activation, regression testing and approved transports remain essential.

Discuss a representative set of findings to assess suitability before agreeing a pilot.

Discuss a POC
03
Build confidence in change

SAP Agentic AI Automated Testing

Under validation

The business problem

SAP changes can affect connected business processes. Repetitive test execution and fragmented evidence make release assessment harder.

Our engineering approach

Our testing work explores AI-assisted test-case generation, execution orchestration, evidence collection and failure analysis. Business owners review important outcomes before release decisions.

  • Test generation and regression orchestration
  • Evidence capture and failure investigation
  • Reporting with review of critical results
Testing / execution orchestration
EXAMPLE TEST SUITE

Purchase-to-pay

Test caseWorkflow state
01Create purchase requisitionQueued
02Create purchase orderRunning
03Record goods receiptValidating
04Review invoice evidenceCompleted
Execution evidence collected for reviewer assessment
ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOWHuman oversight by design
  1. 01Define cases
  2. 02Queue execution
  3. 03Run workflow
  4. 04Validate evidence
  5. 05Review results
EXPECTED VALUE

More repeatable test coordination and a clearer evidence trail for assessing changes in the agreed test scope.

BOUNDARIES & VALIDATION

Coverage is bounded by the test design, access, test data and automation compatibility. A completed run does not prove an entire business process is defect-free.

Discuss a controlled POC. System access, representative test data and acceptance criteria must be agreed first.

Discuss a POC
04
Preserve the business document

AI-Assisted Smart Forms to Adobe Forms Migration

Under validation

The business problem

A Smart Form contains more than its visible layout. Interfaces, conditions, text, calculations, fonts and output behavior all affect the migration.

Our engineering approach

Migration agents assist with structure extraction, analysis, interface and layout generation. SAP validation and output comparison provide the evidence needed for a human approval decision.

  • Smart Form discovery and structure extraction
  • Adobe interface and layout generation
  • SAP validation, PDF comparison and human review
Forms / transformation & validation
SAP SMART FORM

Purchase order

▾ Global definitions
Interface / header data
▾ Page / MAIN window
Item table
Totals & conditions
▾ Footer / text elements
AnalyzeTransformValidate
ADOBE FORM / PDF

Purchase order

PO · EXAMPLEDocument preview
Supplier / delivery details
ItemQtyValue
Total / currency
Interface checks Output comparison Human review
ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOWHuman oversight by design
  1. 01Discover Smart Forms
  2. 02Extract metadata
  3. 03Analyze structure
  4. 04Generate Adobe layout
  5. 05Validate in SAP
  6. 06Compare outputs
  7. 07Human approval
EXPECTED VALUE

A structured migration workflow that helps teams identify differences and focus review on layout, data and business logic.

BOUNDARIES & VALIDATION

Not every form can be converted automatically. ADS configuration, fonts, barcodes, translations and custom logic may require specialist intervention. No one-click or pixel-identical guarantee is made.

Discuss a selected-form POC using source definitions, interfaces and representative outputs. Scope and acceptance criteria are agreed before execution.

Discuss a POC
05
Investigate before you change

SAP Agentic AI Performance Optimization (HANA)

In development

The business problem

A slow query may reflect execution plans, data volume, contention or application behavior. Recommendations need the context of the workload.

Our engineering approach

Performance agents are designed to examine authorized SQL and workload evidence, identify possible bottlenecks and prepare recommendations for controlled testing.

  • SQL and query-pattern analysis
  • Bottleneck investigation and recommendations
  • Human-approved optimization validation
HANA / query investigation
Read
JoinInvestigate
Aggregate
Relative query durationIllustrative values
Baseline
100
Candidate
100

Synthetic index values, not measured results or a forecast. Test recommendations against a representative workload before approval.

ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOWHuman oversight by design
  1. 01Observe workload
  2. 02Analyze SQL
  3. 03Locate bottlenecks
  4. 04Recommend changes
  5. 05Validate and approve
EXPECTED VALUE

A more organized investigation, with traceable hypotheses and a validation plan for each proposed improvement.

BOUNDARIES & VALIDATION

Performance gains are workload-specific and cannot be guaranteed. Changes require representative benchmarking and human approval; agents should not make uncontrolled production changes.

Discuss a feasibility review using permitted, sanitized performance evidence.

Discuss a POC
LET’S BUILD WITH PURPOSE

Explore what Agentic AI could do for your SAP landscape.